RSS | Advanced Search | Site Map | Text Size a- A+
City of Colorado Springs
We Create Community

NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.

 System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.

MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING - MAIN
06965 TUTT BLVD

Review DateStatusComment(s)
9/8/2014 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Tuscany Plaza You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments: 1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS 2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.
Attention*****(STANDARD COMMENT 2) BUILDING DATA: Size of Bldg. ---11744-- sq ft Construction Type --VB---- Fire Sprinklers Y--XX--- N----- Fire Walls Y ----- Rating ----- N ----- Required GPM: --1500--- gpm # of hydrant(s) required: ---1-- Max AVG spacing between hydrants: ---500-- ft Max hose lay: --250--- ft
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SCOPE OF WORK: -----MAIN EXTENSION -----UTILITY SERVICE PLAN -----DOMESTIC ONLY - NO FIRE INSPECTION REQUIRED -----FIRE/DOMESTIC - --XX---WATER PLAN --XX---Site Specific -----Subdivision - No Fire Inspection Required
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) FIRE FLOW/HYDRANT REQUIREMENTS MET: On this site the theoretical water flows are --2200-- gpm, and the numbers of hydrant(s) are --4--. This site, based upon the provided theoretical modeled fire flows, appear to meet the minimum flow requirements and/or the number of hydrant(s) for this structure.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT 10) INSPECTIONS Please call 719-385-5982 Extension 2 to schedule all construction related inspection activities. You will need to schedule an inspection at the time of Framing and a final inspection near completion. Due to the dynamic nature of inspectors schedules, PLEASE call your inspection requests in with ample time to allow scheduling. When calling, please have your complete CSFD plan review number(s) ready for each inspection request. ( i.e. 2013-1234 - HS-1) The CSFD Approved sets of plans are to be on site for all inspections.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED ITEMS ADDRESSED: The plans have been resubmitted and all the disapproved comments have been addressed and/or corrected as follows: 1. Development plan has been approved 2. Hydrants are labeled on plan according to CSU records.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)
6/17/2014 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Medical Office Bldg 6965 Tutt Bd New Medical Office Building You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments: 1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS 2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.
Attention*****(STANDARD COMMENT 2) BUILDING DATA: Size of Bldg. --11744--- sq ft Construction Type ---VB--- Fire Sprinklers Y--XX--- N----- Fire Walls Y ----- Rating ----- N ----- Required GPM: ---1500-- gpm 50% REDUCTION FOR SPRINKLERS # of hydrant(s) required: --1--- (# TO MEET REQ'D SPACING) Max AVG spacing between hydrants: --500--- ft Max hose lay: --250--- ft
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SCOPE OF WORK: -----MAIN EXTENSION --XX---UTILITY SERVICE PLAN -----DOMESTIC ONLY - NO FIRE INSPECTION REQUIRED --XX---FIRE/DOMESTIC - --XX---WATER PLAN --XX---Site Specific -----Subdivision - No Fire Inspection Required
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) FIRE FLOW/HYDRANT REQUIREMENTS MET: On this site the theoretical water flows are --2200-- gpm, and the numbers of hydrant(s) are --4--. This site, based upon the provided theoretical modeled fire flows, appear to meet the minimum flow requirements and/or the number of hydrant(s) for this structure.
DisapprovedDISAPPROVED The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review: 1. Plans are labeled as "NODES" with no reference to the fire flow calculations provided. Plans must indicate fire flow information on the plans, respective to the associated hydrant. Also: 1) Review all redline comments and address each one. 2) Return ALL red lined plan sets for each re-review.
Disapproved(DISAPPROVED) DEVELOPMENT PLAN According to the CSFD records for this project, the Development Plan for this site has not been approved by the fire department. This hydrant/water plan can not be approved until the D.P. has been approved by the CSFD.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)


 

Contact Us: Email Us - Call: 385-CITY (719-385-2489) - RSS - Privacy, Linking and ADA Policies - designed, developed by projecta.com

printer friendly version Printer friendly version