NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.
System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.
PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
11195 HIGHWAY 83
||FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Pikes Peak Community College, Rampart Range Campus, 11195 Hy 83: fire alarm system replacement with MNS
Date of Plans: 6.15.13
This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.|
|FYI||(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS:
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the adopted International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.
|Disapproved||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 19) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS
The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments:
1. Permit application was not provided for this system review.
2. Cut sheets were not provided
3. With all MNS submittals, the risk analysis and emergency response and evacuation plan must be included.
4. Plans were not signed/sealed by RME of a licensed contractor
5. Veritas is not licensed within this jurisdiction to design/install fire alarm systems
6. What happened with the fire alarm system replacement that was phased over 2010-2012?
7. Text is too light to read, and scan/archive - all text needs to be darkened.
Incomplete submittal - no review plans withdrawn.
Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
|Attention||(STANDARD COMMENT 26) THE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS.
It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.|