||Approved||Plans brought in for signature indicating check valve for FDC will be located inside heated building per DEW directions.
Plans being signed.|
||FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Shell Building, 5262 N Nevada University Village: new retail strip center with possible restaurant
You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments:
1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS
2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.|
|Attention||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 2) BUILDING DATA:
Size of Bldg. -11,046---- sq ft
Construction Type ----V-B--
Fire Sprinklers Y-XXX--- N-----
Required GPM: -1500--- gpm
# of hydrant(s) required: ---1--
Max AVG spacing between hydrants: --500--- ft
Max hose lay: --250--- ft
|FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SCOPE OF WORK:
--XXX---UTILITY SERVICE PLAN - FIRE/DOMESTIC -
|FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT) FIRE FLOW/HYDRANT REQUIREMENTS MET:
On this site the theoretical water flows are -4100--- gpm, and the numbers of hydrant(s) are --1--.
This site, based upon the provided theoretical modeled fire flows, appear to meet the minimum flow requirements and/or the number of hydrant(s) for this structure.|
|Attention||(STANDARD COMMENT) READY FOR SIGNATURES:
The water plans appear ready for signature as long as all disapproved comments have been addressed. Please provide one hard copy for CSFD records along with your final copies for our signature.
|FYI||(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS:
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.