| Review Date | Status | Comment(s) |
| 12/28/2012 |
FYI | *****(STANDARD COMMENT) HYDRANT REQUIREMENTS:
Size of Bldg. 4408 sq ft
Construction Type VB
Fire Sprinklers Y-- N--
Fire Walls being installed Y -- N X;
Largest area formed from Fire Walls 4408;
Required GPM: 1750 gpm
# of hydrant(s) required: 1
Max AVG spacing between hydrants: 500 ft
Max hose lay: 250 ft
On site theoretical fire flows are 3600 gpm where 1750 gpm required;
Is this a simultaneous flow Y -- N x;
On site number of hydrant(s) are 2 where 1 are required
The plans have been resubmitted and the fire flow information has been provided by CSU as indicated above. |
| 12/20/2012 |
FYI | *****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Cheyenne Mountain Childrens Dentistry. 3695 Star Ranch Road. SHELL ONLY
Date of Plans: 11.21.12
You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments:
1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS
2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.
|
| FYI | (STANDARD COMMENT) PARALLEL REVIEWS
This project is utilizing the parallel review process. When responding to agency review comments in PATH 2, please be sure you are inserting the requested information into the PATH 2 plan set. CSFD needs to have a complete set of plans (MEP, structural, architectural), etc) to conduct our reviews - we cannot comment on information that is not presented to us.
|
| Disapproved | (STANDARD COMMENT) NO HYDRANT LOCATIONS PROVIDED OR NOTED
Your hillside residential home lot plans do not indicate where the existing hydrants are located, and the fire flow information has not been provided.
To request a fire flow report, please go to: http://www.csu.org/business/businesswithus/Documents/item10501.pdf |
| Disapproved | (DISAPPROVED) FIRE FLOW REPORT
Provide confirmation on the fire flow results from Colorado Springs Utilities. A copy of their report for this area is required to be provided with your plan submittals.
When multiple fire flows are provided from CSU, please indicate all flows on your submitted plans.
NOTE - To request a fire flow report, please go to: http://www.csu.org/business/businesswithus/documents/item10501.pdf
|
| FYI | (STANDARD COMMENT) CORRECTIONS
All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provid submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax or verbally.
|
| Attention | (STANDARD COMMENT) THE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGNER/ARCHITECT TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE ADOPTED CODES/STANDARDS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIO TO RESUBMITTING.
|
| FYI | (STANDARD COMMENT) RESUBMITTALS
Re-reviews may be submitted back to the CSFD by direct submittal at the Construction Services counter, or through the Regional Building Department's routing system.
|
| FYI | (STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirements are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether or not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the adopted fire code requirements, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.
(105.4.4)
|
