||Approved||Letter dated 2/25/13 from CSU (on letterhead) stating previously reviewed lateral is approved by CSU and they are just waiting to sign after CSFD signs.|
||FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Harrison School District Administration Building: tear down and build new
Date of Plans: 2.4.13
You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments:
1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS
2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.|
|Attention||*****(STANDARD COMMENT 2) BUILDING DATA:
Size of Bldg. --34,808--- sq ft
Construction Type --II-B----
Fire Sprinklers Y--XXX--- N-----
Fire Walls Y ----- N --XXX---
Required GPM: -2000--- gpm
# of hydrant(s) required: ----2-
Max AVG spacing between hydrants: ---450-- ft
Max hose lay: --225-- ft
|FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SCOPE OF WORK:
|FYI||*****(STANDARD COMMENT) FIRE FLOW/HYDRANT REQUIREMENTS MET:
On this site the theoretical water flows are -2200--- gpm, and the numbers of hydrant(s) are -2--.
This site, based upon the provided theoretical modeled fire flows, appear to meet the minimum flow requirements and/or the number of hydrant(s) for this structure.|
The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review:
1. Service lines are not permitted on hydrant laterals by CSU standards.
1) Review all redline comments and address each one.
2) Return ALL red lined plan sets for each re-review.|
|FYI||(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS:
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2003 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.