RSS | Advanced Search | Site Map | Text Size a- A+
City of Colorado Springs
We Create Community

NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.

 System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.

VERIZON GENERATOR BUILDING
04333 ARROWSWEST DR

Review DateStatusComment(s)
2/19/2013 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: Verizon Wireless Generator Building, 4333 Arrowswest Dr: new generator and fuel storage tank building Date of Plans: TBD
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT 6) The WATER MIST system is being installed by: westfire This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted International Building Code, International Fire Code, and the 2010 editions of NFPA Standard 750 as applicable. CSFD does not allow any combustibles into a building until a sprinkler system has passed it's final acceptance test performed by CSFD Inspector's.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2003 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT 42) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to conducting a full plan review. PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING ON LETTERHEAD TO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: 1. Incorrect address is provided 2. What is the delay in reporting a/c power loss? 3. symbol legend does not apply to this submittal as it is for the data center and FM-200 systems, not the water mist system. 4. What type of nozzle is being used? Automatic, non-autmatic, hybrid? cut sheets do not call out the spcific model of nozzle that is to be used as required. 5. Is this system pre-engineered, engineered, wet/dry; local application or total flooding? 6. Provide the listing information on the nozzles as required by 5.6.1 of NFPA 750. Review stopped, incomplete information. Date on plans is 4.15.13 which is interesting since it occurs in the future. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
Disapproved(STANDARD COMMENT 43) PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: All plans submitted are required to have the FIRE DEPARTMENT "PLAN REVIEW NUMBER" provided on the submitted plans. This Number can be obtained from the general contractor, and is a specific number assigned to each individual project reviewed by the CSFD. All projects have a plan review number assigned.
Attention(STANDARD COMMENT 45) THE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.


 

Contact Us: Email Us - Call: 385-CITY (719-385-2489) - RSS - Privacy, Linking and ADA Policies - designed, developed by projecta.com

printer friendly version Printer friendly version